Apple’s headset obstacles, and what AI can gain from nuclear security

The ‘another thing’ revealed by Apple at its Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) this year was the market’s worst-kept trick. The Apple Vision Pro, the tech giant’s gamble on making combined truth headsets a thing, has actually gotten a blended reception. The majority of the issue has actually fixated the eye-watering $3,499 expense.

However there’s a larger issue: Whether there’ll suffice apps readily available to make the expense of the gadget worth it. It’s a genuine difficulty to revamp apps for a totally brand-new user interface– and designers are worried. Check out the complete story

— Chris Stokel-Walker

To prevent AI doom, gain from nuclear security

For the previous couple of weeks, the AI discourse has actually been controlled by those who believe we might establish an artificial-intelligence system that will one day ended up being so effective it will eliminate mankind.

So how do business themselves propose we prevent AI mess up? One proposed option originates from a brand-new paper by DeepMind et al that recommends that AI designers must assess a design’s capacity to trigger “severe” dangers prior to even beginning any training.

The procedure might assist designers choose whether it’s too dangerous to continue. However possibly it ‘d be more practical for the AI sector to draw lessons from a field that understands a thing or more about really genuine existential dangers– security research study and threat mitigation around nuclear weapons.

— Melissa Heikkilä

Melissa’s story is from The Algorithm, her weekly newsletter providing you the within track on all things AI. Register to get it in your inbox every Monday.

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: